Virginia Albarino Showdown 2026

Albariño is a proven winner in Virginia. It’s currently the 9th most planted grape in the state, going from 61 acres in 2021 to 86 acres in 2025. While the popularity of many varieties have plateaued, growers can’t get enough of this one.

There are conflicting stories who first brought Albariño to the US; Markus and Liz Bokisch of Bokisch Vineyards (in Lodi) or Jenny McCloud of Virginia’s own Chrysalis Vineyards. But there’s no doubt that Jenny had the first local commercial planting, back in 1996.

Jenny explained the idea for planting a Spanish variety was inspired by an American Society of Enology and Viticulture panel on ‘alternative grapes’ led by Dennis Horton and Alan Kinne of Horton Vineyards. But it wasn’t until Jenny visited Rías Baixas that she discovered Albariño, which impressed her with its minerality and acidity.

She may not have realized it at the time, but the weather in Rías Baixas is similar to that of Virginia. Not only do both regions endure high levels of humidity, frequent Atlantic squalls make Rías Baixas one of Spain’s wettest regions. These conditions mean grapes that grow there would likely also perform well in Virginia.

Tasting & Scoring Methodology

A group of friends & I blind tasted 10 wines in 2 flights. All the flights were bagged blind.

We didn’t have a fancy scoring system. The goal was to pick a ‘favorite’ every round, as opposed to rating them and determining ‘the best’ wine.

There’s a reason behind this madness. Qualified wine judges know how to put aside their biases and pick ‘the best’ even if it’s not their favorite. Some tasters at my table have the experience to do that, but not most of them.

Beyond that, I find industry tastings tend to define ‘best’ as ‘the way it’s made in the Old World’, a viewpoint I find to be snobbish.

Experienced tasters prize ‘Typicity’; how clearly a wine shows the distinct traits of the grape. The problem I see with this standard is typicity is often synonymous with how that wine tastes coming from ‘Old World’ regions.

But Virginia’s terroir is different from what you find in Europe, so conforming to Bordeaux/Chablis/ect is a standard we’d always fail. That’s why I insist people judge these wines on ‘is it good’ as opposed to ‘does it conform to the WSET III tasting grid’.

While all my events are often casual, this particular one was especially industry or experience-heavy.

The Albariño contenders:

  1. Revalation Vineyard 2025
  2. Good Spirit Farm 2024
  3. Nokesville Winery 2023
  4. Chrysalis Verde 2024
  5. Ingleside Vineyard 2024
  6. October One Vineyard 2025
  7. Fifty-Third Vineyards 2024
  8. Blenheim Vineyards 2024
  9. Afton Mountain Vineyards 2024
  10. Crimson Lane Vineyards 2023

Most of the above sell for $30-$35. Blenheim and Chrysalis Verde go for $25.

Flight #1

  • Bottle #1: Revalation Vineyard 2025
  • Bottle #2: Good Spirit Farm 2024

Bottle #1/ Revalation Vineyard 2025. The more complex and weightier of the two, and more recognizable as ‘Albariño’. Slightly more golden in color. My favorite descriptor is it had a ‘Piña colada’ quality to it. Rougher acidity, more citrus-grapefruit notes. The finish really carried through.

Bottle #2/ Good Spirit Farm 2024. Pale, with peach and melon notes. Less recognizable as an Albariño; maybe more of a Sauv Blanc or even a Riesling. Several mentioned it had a flintiness to it. More notes of peach and melon, maybe even grapefruit.

Alex: For #1, felt a burst of acidity up front. Detected notes of lemon-lime, maybe as a jolly rancher. For #2, notes of flint.

Ashley: Loved the finish of #1. Detected notes of honeysuckle and peach in #2

Renee: Thought #1 was ‘barnyard-adjacent’ (this wasn’t a negative)

Sedale: Described #2 as ‘green’. Notes of melon and had a flintiness to it

Zena: For #1 detected notes of lime and felt it was zesty and crisp. It started as lime driven

Flight #2

  • Bottle #3: Nokesville Winery 2023
  • Bottle #4: Chrysalis Vineyards ‘Verde’ 2024

This round couldn’t be more different from the first. #3/Nokesville was more Chardonnay-ish than anything, while #4/Chrystalis was the most fruit-driven wine of the day (not that we minded; it was delicious).

Bottle #3/ Nokesville 2023: This felt more like a Chardonnay than an Albariño. One person wondered if it was a little oxidized. But overall, very clean and smooth, with notes of ripe fruit, especially citrus. One person mentioned it has a golden raisin bouquet.

Bottle #4/ Chrysalis Verde 2024: This was the definition of a porch-sipping wine and was unlike any we had in the entire day of tasting.

Tasting notes included very bright and fruit driven. One person mentioned Asian pear; another said it was honey-ish, maybe notes of old apple. It had a distinct ‘pop’ when I opened it since it was a screwcap wine.

Flight #3

  • Bottle #5: Ingleside Vineyard 2024
  • Bottle #6: October One 2025

This was our favorite round. We were convinced both were barrel aged, because there was a roundness and overall complexity to both that we hadn’t seen so far. If some rounds were for casual drinkers, this was the round for wine lovers.

I was able to capture a lot of individual feedback on this round, so I listed them separately as opposed to consolidating them.

Bottle #5/ Ingleside Vineyards 2024: Golden color, and notes of lemon peel.

Bottle #6/ October One 2025: Less floral than #5, but more pepper notes. It was definitely Albariño-ish. It also evolved a lot in the glass.

Kendell: #5 / Ingleside was a little viscous and zesty, notes of lemon peel. He enjoyed the nice lingering finish and called it a ‘wine drinker’s wine’. #6 had a tea note and notable viscosity.

Matt: Loved both; was convinced both were barrel aged based on the roundness. Thought #6 was more mineral driven, with notes of lemon

Renee: #5 was full and ‘round’. Notes of citrus was there but not ‘bright’ citrus. Clearer acidity and nice finish.

Sedale: #5 was ‘warmer’, some citrus notes and weight. #6 was riper and had more acidity.

Zena: #5 was round, pretty, and ‘all the things I like’. #6 had notes of peach, stone fruit, and lime

Flight #4

  • Bottle #7: Fifty-Third Vineyards 2024
  • Bottle #8: Blenheim Vineyards 2024

These two were strikingly similar, at least initially. Over time we found more differences.

Bottle #7/ Fifty-Third Vineyards 2024: We generally agreed this was more similar to a Sauvignon Blanc than an Albariño. Bright, sharp acidity. Lime nose. Someone mentioned bitter almond on the nose, and somewhat on the palate. I detected white pepper.

Bottle #8/ Blenheim Vineyards 2024: This was probably the most Rias Baixas-like wine of the lineup. Very soft and approachable. Citrus notes were there, but not especially potent. One mentioned it was a “lime bomb”.

This was the only wine in the entire day were people consistently mentioned saline as a tasting note. Compared to #7 there was more fruit here, with peach especially mentioned.

Alex: Mentioned #8 had a burst of acidity up front.

Kendell: Thought #8 was accessible and clean. Kept emphasizing his surprise of the saline qualities and genuinely wondered if it was a Spanish wine.

Flight #5

  • Bottle #9: Afton Mountain 2024
  • Bottle #10: Crimson Lane 2023

My wine notes were getting weak by this point, so I don’t have as much to write.

Bottle #9/ Afton Mountain 2024 – faulted bottle! It happens. But let me tell you about this wine, because I was really, really looking forward to trying it.

This was the winner of the 2024 Monticello Cup, plus scored a Gold at the Virginia Governor’s Cup. I set it aside with the intention of using it for my event, but by luck of the draw this particular bottle had issues. Maybe a faulty cork or seal?

Bottle #10/ Crimson Lane 2023: Notes of melon and citrus were mentioned. I heard its high acidity had an almost pineapple quality to it. It also had some salinity to it, with a pithy finish. It was the only wine of the lineup that I heard ‘smoky’ and ‘funky’ as descriptors.

Finalist Round

I put all the wines on the table and allowed for re-tastings. Every participant gave me a ‘top’ wine, a runner up, and a third place. 3 points went to 1st place, 2 points for 2nd place, and 1 point for 3rd place.

We quickly gravitated to 5 wines, with a top 3 being almost universally agreed upon. #1 seemed to die off a little in the finalist round, and we increasingly gravitated to #4. #5 and #6 were almost neck-in-neck.

The scores for ‘Favorite Albariño’

  • Bottle #5: 2024 Ingleside Vineyards (Top wine of the day)
  • Bottle #6: 2025 October One Vineyards (Runner Up)
  • Bottle #4: 2024 Chrysalis Vineyards (3rd place choice)

So Is there ‘Typicity’ in Virginia Albariño?

The short answer – these wines were all over the tasting map.

Of the 9 we sampled (discounting one with a fault), 3 had distinctly non- Albariño tasting profiles. Whether it was that particular vintage, winemaking decisions, or our palates were off, I can’t say.

Most of us agreed that 4-5 were broadly in the Albariño category, in terms of weight, tasting profile, and acidity. Some people mentioned #1 / #3 / #4 / #8 had that saline content that is identifiable as ‘classic Albariño’, but not all agreed.

1-2 were very close to a Rías Baixas wine, especially the #8 / Blenheim which was almost a dead ringer. #10 / Crimson was also mentioned for having a good amount of salinity.

Descriptions of our “Top Three”

Ingleside Vineyards 2024 Albariño: Ingleside is located in the Northern Neck and historically has made one of the better rated Albariños in Virginia. This particular wine scored Double Gold in the San Francisco Chronicle wine competition, one of the largest wine events in the USA.

Tech notes: 100% stainless steel, 12.5% alcohol. Mostly made from older vines.

October One Vineyards 2025 Albariño: Grown at Bluemont, made by Walsh Family Wine, and sold in an urban tasting room in Leesburg. Normally this is a club wine because of scarcity, but I was allowed to buy this one for my event.

Chrysalis Vineyards 2024 Albariño Verde: Chrysalis makes two different Albariños; this one, and a barrel-aged one. Ironically, I prefer the Verde, because it’s just so easy to drink.

At $25 it was also the least expensive wine of the day, yet rated as one of our favorites.

Fjord Vineyards

As a native of the Hudson Valley, you can imagine how pleased I am at the proliferation of vineyards in the area. When Fjord opened along Route 9 at a site not far from the Hudson River, I marked it as a must-visit, even if it took me a while.

Fjord Vineyards is owned by Matt Spaccarelli, part of the same family that owns nearby Benmarl Winery. Matt was already making Benmarl’s wines but wanted to branch out. He founded Fjord in 2013 as a 2nd label, giving him the flexibility to be a little more experimental.

Now, Matt makes wine for both locations. Fjord’s wines are made with their 42 acres of estate grapes, which include 3 acres of Albariño (the largest planting of this variety in New York State).

At first, I thought the name was a homage to a cool piece of Norwegian topography, but it’s more than that.

It turns out a nearby section of the Hudson River might properly be called a fjord, defined by wiki as a “long, narrow sea inlet with steep sides or cliffs, created by a glacier”. This waterway helps remove cold air from the vineyard, allowing them to produce varieties that otherwise wouldn’t survive elsewhere.

My server gave me the low-down on their wines; $20 for 4 samples, out of a total of 6 options including Riesling, Albariño, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, a red blend, and a rosé. They also had other beverage options, including wine cocktails, beer (outsourced), and a Blanc de Blanc.

At this point I did a double take. Wait…what did you say? An Albariño? In New York?!?

It turns out this variety is one of those ‘experimental’ varies my server was referring to, and one they were especially proud of. Albariño is typically a warm weather grape found in Spain and Portugal, hence an unusual choice for cool-weather New York. But it was doing well enough to warrant keeping it.

It’s lucky they did. About a month after my visit, this Albariño won “Best white” at the Hudson Valley Wine Competition (and Fjord earned “Best Winery”). So I guess I’m not the only one who liked it.

Wines I tried:

  • Albariño: Heavy on the minerality, with stone fruit on the side. Not as much citrus as I would have expected. Very aromatic, with notes of lemon added in.
  • Chardonnay: Bright, lots of stone fruit, especially apricot. I also detected some vanilla notes, perhaps from the barrel. But it definitely wasn’t over oaked; just enough to be detectable.
  • Rosé: Red fruit; maybe notes of pepper or spice
  • Riesling: Very bright, leaning off-dry
  • Pinot Noir: A winner! And tough to grow in this area. Some earth and cherry notes (more the later than the former); very traditional flavors for this variety.
  • “Double Fall Line” red blend: Notes of earth and red currant. Very smooth.

Definitely visit on a sunny day so you can enjoy the view!

Between my guests and I were covered all six options (doubling up on the Albariño).